|
Seattle,
Washington December 8, 2008
Dear
friends:
I wish to extend my apologies
for surprising state and local officials and organizations in the states where
we have proposed projects. The FERC acted on our
applications faster than I think it has ever acted for any applicant
before, and, frankly, it caught it us off guard. We have not
had time to contact the political, energy and ocean leaders in
our project areas.
We have been
developing a demonstration project for an offshore wind/wave
renewable energy platform in Washington state since Oct. 2007.
We applied for a FERC preliminary permit to explore the feasibility
of the site in Oct. 28, 2007. FERC did not even open the
permit application for public comment until five months later.
We were finally issued the preliminary permit on July 30, 2007, nine
months after we applied.
On October
16, 2008, the FERC announced it is asserting jurisdiction over wave
and tidal energy development on all national waters, including
offshore beyond the state 3-mile limit. The Minerals
Management Service contests this jurisdiction and we will see how
that is resolved. Meanwhile we have the right technology
solution and team, we know what kind of sites are ideal, and we know
how to apply for FERC preliminary permits that grant site
development priority rights. We had not been considering
projects in other states. But when the FERC opened the door to
the national offshore opportunity on October 16 we were ready and we
stepped right through.
Then FERC
surprised us greatly by its rapid response. Our first
application took FERC five months to open for comment. This
time they did it in five weeks! We have been preparing to contact the officials
in the states affected by our applications in January and February,
after the holidays and the Presidential transition and the new
Federal agency heads are in place. I
personally called FERC and asked them to
open the public comment period in January or February, because
opening it in December is rather unfair to the public - the holiday
season is a big distraction and I don't think the public and
agencies really get a "normal" 60-day comment period if it opens on
November 28.
A proposal
for offshore energy development of course greatly concerns state and
local officials and the affected public and interest groups.
We have great experience in stakeholder consultation and the
permitting processes and we like the FERC system, unlike almost every
other developer, because it requires and directs an extensive
consultation process with every stakeholder. We will follow
that process and contact
state and local leadership in our site areas beginning in January 2008.
We have already contacted a few key people in each state.
We look
forward to receiving "official" comments on our applications to FERC
during the 60-day period, and of course we want any feedback at any
time to help us understand local concerns and learn how we can
advance this tremendous opportunity in open partnership and
collaboration.
Commenting
on the FERC applications is easy - when you have the
Docket number of the application go to
FERC Online
and use the options available.
Have a happy
holiday season, let's hope Santa and Obama bring us lots of support
for large-scale sustainable ocean renewable energy generation and
green jobs in our communities.
Sincerely,
Burton
Hamner President, Grays Harbor Ocean Energy Company LLC |